Crime has undermined virtually every aspect of the American government ‘s drive towards the attainment and sustainability of political stability, economic growth, and development, the rule of law, and enhance the capacity of U.S. criminal justice, system, and policy formulation agencies to address homeland security problem. There is a critical need for the criminal justice system and policy development bodies such as Diversion Control Program and Drug Enforcement Administration. All these at policy formulation bodies under DEA, not only collect, but also share and analyze information about crime and have seamless communication with each other in pursuit of strategies for its reduction. The overall efficacy of such bodies is heavily dependent on the streamlined exchange of appropriate and necessary crime-based information for policy formulation among the agencies.
The above mentioned U.S. criminal justice system, and policy development agencies, relay information to decision makers using computer-based information systems. The computer-based information systems of each criminal justice system, and policy formulation agency focus on research on crime based policies. The chief and overarching goal of the criminal justice system, and policy development agencies actions on policies are to influence the institution of policies on an incremental basis. The intention of the direct impact on an additional basis targets to win society’s approval towards ensuring public safety because criminal justice policy development takes place within the controls of political dynamics (Haugen, & Musser, 2009).
Need help with essays, dissertations, homework, and assignments? Stop wasting time and post your project on tutlance and get a real professional to do your work at CHEAP prices. Watch while Tutlance experts outbid each other.
Evidence from state and federal government reviews and assessments indicate the challenge of lack of coordination of the sharing of criminal justice information arising from the different jurisdictional mandates, capacity and financing levels, agency independence as well as security concerns during criminal justice policy discourses. The recent reviews and assessments at all government levels underline the widespread lack of the capacity and understanding essential to the sharing, or dissemination and usage of information maturely and more efficiently. Fiscal inadequacy and restraint, in the recent years in the wake of the criminal justice system getting more complex along with difficulties in the effective and efficient administration, has resulted in the individual deferrals of the proposed upgrades to older federal government computer-based information systems (Davies, Croall, & Tyrer, 2010).
Gaps in information sharing have led to difficulties in the formulation of highly sensitive crime based policies. Additionally, initial state assessments highlight the lack of a comprehensive set of data standards, centralized index of crime related information for the identification and compilation of information that ought to be not only shared but also exchanged among the various criminal justice policy development agencies. The incompatibility in jurisdictional systems has consequently led to delays that pose a risk of errors with the potential of fatal results (Davies, Croall, & Tyrer, 2010).
Often this U.S. criminal justice system and policy development agencies operate independently of one another. Consequently, resulting in a myriad of sharing and exchange of incomplete information, redundancies in the exchange of information policies, procedures, and systems, errors and other inefficiencies in communication that the policy maker’s hamper ability to formulate prudent strategic decisions that uphold public safety effectively. Therefore, these U.S. criminal justice system and policy development agencies should embrace a systematic and synchronized undertaking to govern inter-agency data transfer and dissemination. In the wake of the general civil and technological differentiation and advancement, there arises the need for strategic and well thought of investments in technology anchored on open standards that meet the threshold of information standards at all government levels (Haugen, & Musser, 2009).
Davies, M., Croall, H., & Tyrer, J. (2010). Criminal justice (1st Ed.). New York: Pearson Longman.
Haugen, D., & Musser, S. (2009). Criminal justice (1st Ed.). Detroit: Greenhaven Press.
Stop struggling with your academic work! Why not post your project and get 100% authentic work done at your price? Click the button below to choose your expert for free.
