When you are assigned an article review essay, it is important to understand the assignment and to read the article carefully. The goal of an article review is not to offer your own opinion on the article, but rather to provide critical analysis of the article. This includes a summary of the article’s main points, as well as your evaluation of those points. To write an effective review, it is important to be clear about what you liked and didn’t like about the article. Finally, make sure to conclude your essay with a strong argument for or against the author’s main point.
What is an article review?
An article review is a written evaluation of a scholarly article. Typically, scholars write reviews for journals, and academics use reviews to evaluate articles before deciding whether or not to incorporate them into their research. When writing an article review, scholars should assess the quality of the research, the findings of the article, and its implications for their work. To provide a comprehensive and critical evaluation, it is important to carefully read and consider the article from multiple perspectives. Additionally, when writing a review, it is important to be constructive and objective to provide useful feedback for the author. Ultimately, though, the purpose of an article review is to help other scholars determine the value of an article for their research.
Reasons to write an article review
As a college student, you’ll likely be assigned to write an article review. Several purposes of writing an article review exist.
The first is to summarize the main points of the article for someone who hasn’t read it. This is especially helpful if the article is long.
The second purpose is to evaluate the article, which you’ll do by offering your own opinion on its merits.
Third, writing an article review can help you develop critical thinking skills. You’ll need to read the article closely and think about what it’s saying before you can offer your interpretation.
Lastly, by writing an article, you’ll deepen your understanding of the subject matter.
Types of article review
There are two types of article reviews: critical and narrative.
Critical article review
In a critical article review, the focus is on evaluating the strengths and weaknesses of the article. The reviewer may agree or disagree with the author’s argument, but the goal is to identify the key points of the article and to assess how well the author supports those points.
A narrative article review.
In a narrative article review, the focus is on summarizing the main points of the article. The goal is to provide a clear, concise overview of the author’s argument and to highlight any implications for further research. Although both types of article reviews have their own merits, critical reviews are generally more helpful in terms of identifying gaps in the current body of research.
An academic article review.
Academic article reviews are typically written by students or scholars as a way of critiquing the work of another scholar. In this type of review, the reviewer will usually summarize the main argument of the article, assess its strengths and weaknesses, and offer their own opinion on the overall quality of the piece.
A general article review.
General article reviews, on the other hand, are typically written by journalists or other experts in a given field. These reviews are designed to give readers a concise overview of what the article is about and whether or not it is worth reading.
How to write an article review
Reviewing an article is a complex task that requires a variety of skills. To do it effectively, you need to be able to understand the author’s argument and critique their methods. Here are some tips on how to write an effective article review:
1. Read the article carefully.
Read the article thoroughly, taking note of the main points and the author’s argument. As you read, try to identify any bias in the article and whether or not the author has presented a well-rounded view of the topic.
2. Reflect on the article:
Once you have finished reading, take some time to reflect on what you have read. What are your overall impressions of the article? Do you agree or disagree with the author’s argument? What parts of the article were most convincing or least convincing to you?
3. Write a Brief Summary.
After reading and understanding the article, the next step is to summarize the article. This summary should be brief, only a few sentences long. It should cover the main points of the article without going into too much detail. The purpose of this summary is to give the reader a general overview of the article so that they can decide whether or not to read it. When summarizing, be sure to include any important information about the author, such as their credentials or qualifications. Finally, make sure to identify the main argument or thesis of the article. This will help the reader understand what they can expect to find in the rest of the review.
4. Critique the article.
In this stage, you will evaluate the article’s strengths and weaknesses. To do this effectively, you should first identify the article’s purpose. Is it to inform? Persuade? Entertain? Once you have determined the purpose, you can start to assess whether or not the author achieved it.
Consider the following questions:
- Was the topic covered thoroughly?
- Were all sides of the issue represented fairly?
- Was the language clear and free of errors?
- Was the tone appropriate?
After answering these questions, you should have a good sense of the article’s merits and failings. In your critique, be sure to back up your claims with specific examples from the text. By critiquing an article, you are showing that you have thought deeply about its content and can articulate your own opinion on the subject.
5. Create an outline.
The aim of an article review is twofold: to evaluate the content of the piece and to provide your interpretation or opinion of it. To do this effectively, you will need to create an outline.
Your outline should cover three main points: first, you will need to provide a summary of the article; second, you will need to assess the strengths and weaknesses of the piece; and finally, you will need to offer your own opinion or interpretation of it.
Let’s take a closer look at each of these points.
When providing a summary of the article, you should aim to be concise and focus only on the main points. You don’t need to include every single detail; just give the reader a general overview of what the piece is about. When assessing the strengths and weaknesses of the article, you should again be concise and focus only on the most important points. It is helpful to approach this step with a critical eye; however, you should avoid being too negative in your assessment.
Once you are satisfied with the outline, you can now proceed to the actual review writing.
6. Write an Introduction.
The introduction should provide an overview of what will be discussed in the body of your review. It is also a good idea to introduce your readers to the author’s thesis. You can do this by summarizing the main points of their argument. It is important to make sure that your readers understand why you think this article is important. You can do this by explaining how it has affected you or how it has changed your thinking on a particular issue. The introduction can be one or two paragraphs long, depending on how much information you need to include. Finally, you should conclude your introductory paragraph with a brief statement of your overall opinion of the article being reviewed.
7. Write the body paragraphs.
Now that you have a good grasp of what the article is about, it’s time to start writing your review. The body paragraphs of your review will discuss the article in detail and provide evidence to support your opinion. When writing the body paragraphs, it’s important to keep a few things in mind. First, each paragraph should focus on only one point. Second, all of your points should be backed up with evidence from the article. Finally, make sure to transition smoothly from one point to the next. By following these simple guidelines, you can be sure that your review will be well-organized and engaging.
8. Write the Conclusion.
The conclusion of your article review should briefly summarize the main points of the article and reflect on its overall usefulness. Keep in mind that your audience may not have read the article, so you will need to provide a brief overview of its contents. You might also want to suggest further reading for those who are interested in learning more about the topic. In addition, your conclusion should express your own opinion on the article and discuss its implications for practice or research. By taking the time to craft a well-written conclusion, you can ensure that your readers come away with a clear understanding of both the article and your thoughts on its usefulness.
9. Edit and proofread your review.
As any writer knows, proofreading is an essential step in the writing process. Not only does it help to ensure that your article is free of errors, but it also helps to make sure that your argument is clear and concise. When proofreading your article, be sure to read it aloud so that you can catch any errors that you might otherwise miss. Pay close attention to your grammar and spelling, as well as the clarity of your writing. It can also be helpful to read your article from beginning to end, as this will help you to catch any errors that you might have made in your haste to finish the piece.
Sample Essay: Article review example
Below is an example of a 700 words article review essay written about the article “The Use of Knowledge in Society” by F. A. Hayek.
F. A. Hayek’s “The Use of Knowledge in Society” is an important work that addresses the very real problem of how best to use our limited resources of knowledge to achieve the greatest possible good for society. While Hayek’s proposed solution is not without its problems, it is nevertheless a thought-provoking and insightful work that warrants close attention from anyone interested in addressing this issue.
The central problem that Hayek seeks to address is what he refers to as the “knowledge problem.” This is the problem of how best to utilize the limited amount of knowledge that we have to achieve the greatest possible good. Hayek’s proposed solution is to create a market system in which prices act as signals that direct individuals to produce the goods and services that are most in demand.
While Hayek’s proposal has its merits, it is not without its problems. One key problem is that, in practice, markets are often subject to manipulation and corruption. This can lead to the production of goods and services that are not actually in the best interests of society as a whole. Another problem with Hayek’s proposal is that it relies on a relatively simplistic view of human nature. Hayek assumes that individuals will always act in their self-interest and that they will always have perfect information about what is in the best interest of society. This is not always the case in reality.
Despite its problems, Hayek’s “The Use of Knowledge in Society” is a work that is well worth reading. It provides a helpful starting point for thinking about how best to use our limited resources of knowledge. While Hayek’s proposed solution is not perfect, it does offer a useful perspective on this important issue.
Article Review Writing Help
Have you been assigned an article review but aren’t sure how to get started? Well, there is still hope of getting a better grade! At Tutlance, we have a team of top essay writers who can provide expert help with your article review. We’ll make sure that your review is well-written and engaging, and we’ll also provide feedback on the article itself so that you can get a better understanding of the material. So if you’re looking for article review writing help, use our marketplace to connect and find professional help with article review assignments.
What are your thoughts on how to write an article review for school?