Do My Homework / Homework Help Answers / Nursing Homework Help / Nursing- Research Methods. Teaching professionalism and ethics in information technology by deliberative dialogue

Nursing- Research Methods. Teaching professionalism and ethics in information technology by deliberative dialogue

Need help with this question or any other Nursing assignment help task?

Research Methods ICA 2,500 words including a Poster. Teaching professionalism and ethics in information technology by deliberative dialogue. Teaching professionalism and ethics in information technology by deliberative dialogue
Additional Instructions:
IN-COURSE ASSESSMENT (ICA) SPECIFICATION Module Title: Research Methods Module Leader: Dr. Zia Ush Shamszaman Module Code: CIS 4011-N Assignment Title: Deadline Date: 11th May 2022 Deadline Time: 4:00pm Submission Method: Online (Blackboard) þ Middlesbrough Tower ¨ Online Submission Notes: • Please follow carefully the instructions given on the Assignment Specification • When Extenuating Circumstances (e.g. extension) has been granted, a fully completed and signed Extenuating Circumstances form must be submitted to the School Reception or emailed to scdt- assessments@tees.ac.uk. FULL DETAILS OF THE ASSIGNMENT ARE ATTACHED INCLUDING MARKING & GRADING CRITERIA Learning Outcomes Personal and Transferable Skills 1. Communicate complex academic issues effectively to specialist and non- specialist audiences. 2. Defend the rationale and decisions made for the research proposal. Research, Knowledge and Cognitive Skills 3. Select appropriate research strategies and data generation methods for a computing context, and critically evaluate their effectiveness within the development and evaluation of computing-related artefacts. 4. Use a systematic search, analysis, synthesis and critique of the literature within computing to articulate how their work, or planned work, contributes to knowledge within the computing field. 5. Design a research proposal to address significant areas of computing-related theory and/or practice Professional Skills 6. Critique the professional, legal and ethical implications of their work within a computing context. Assessment Strategy Assessment will be by means of a single individual in-course assessment comprising: Element 1: A literature review on a chosen topic (2,500 words) (40%) LO 4. Element 2: A poster outlining an individual proposal for a masters project that could be undertaken in the final stage of a masters programme (60%) LOs 1, 2, 3, 5 and 6. Assessment Criteria Literature Review (40%): • Description of a repeatable search process • Appropriate searching techniques • Review of literature • Limitations of the literature review Poster of Project Proposal (60%): • Research question & anticipated product(s) • Background context of the proposed research • Research Methodology • Evaluation Methodology • Schedule and dissemination plans • Professional, legal and ethical issues Element 1: Systematic Literature Review and Report (2500 words) 40% Identify a computing related research topic or area and carry out a systematic search of Teesside University library’s online databases to identify relevant peer-reviewed academic journal or conference papers (not books). The topic you select for this element will be used for your project proposal (Element 2 of this ICA). Your list of papers should include some primary research, not just articles that summarise the literature or give a personal opinion. Prepare a report to describe your full literature search and review process, including the following: Report Heading Description Introduction Short introduction to your topic (a couple of paragraphs. What area are you interested in? Why do you think it will make a good research topic? Search Results Ideally in table format with columns for keywords, filters, number of results and notes. Here you should show your skill in using the databases. • Specify the database that you use for each search. • Say why you have chosen each database. • Aim to search at least 3 databases. • For each database, continue to refine your results until you have 30 or less. • Notes should contain your thoughts on the number of returned results and your reasoning behind your next search terms to expand/reduce the number of matches. Criteria Define criteria for determining which papers will be included or excluded from the final list. Consider the relevance of each paper identified in the short list (from the searches) and state the reasons (based on the criteria) for including or excluding from the final list. At the end of your literature search you will have a number of papers e.g. 30 or less from each database you searched. This is your short list. You must now decide which papers to include in your final list, and which to exclude. Your final list should contain the 10-30 papers that are most relevant to your chosen research topic. Conclusions What did you learn about doing a systematic literature search? How well do you feel the literature search went? Did it go as you expected? What difficulties did you have? How easy did you find the different databases to use? What limitations did you encounter? Reference List A reference list with full reference details for your final set of papers, Teesside University Harvard style: https://libguides.tees.ac.uk/computing or Bibtex if using the Latex editor. Element 1, your literature search/review report, should be a maximum of 2500 words excluding references. Upload your report (.docx or .pdf) to TurnItIn via the Element 1 submission area for this module on Blackboard. Assessment Marking Criteria Element 1 Element 1 Literature Review (40%) Introduction • Is the topic chosen clearly identified? • Is the topic/research area well explained? Search • Is there a clear description of a systematic and iterative process? Is the whole process traceable? • Is the literature search adequate? E.g. use of appropriate keywords, filters, Booleans and suitable databases/sources. Have 3 (or more) databases been searched? • Has choice of databases been justified? • Have results been narrowed down to 30 or less for each database? • Have notes been included to explain decisions made? Inclusion\Exclusion Criteria • Are appropriate criteria for including/excluding particular papers identified and applied? • Does the final list include empirical research? Conclusions and Limitations • Are valid conclusions drawn about the results of the literature search? • Are the limitations of the search well identified? References List • Are references in Harvard/Bibtex format as appropriate? • Are all elements in the final list of references correct & complete? Overall Professional Quality • Is there a good standard of report writing? E.g. are all elements written in good English, spell-checked & proof-read? • Does the report conform with the specified content? Element 2: Research Proposal Poster 60% Create a research proposal poster, which could form the basis of your master’s project. Your research poster must be based on the topic you chose in Element 1. Your poster should be A3 size. You may use any software to create the poster but the final version must be in pdf format. Your poster will contain a research proposal, a plan for a masters project. It can form the basis of your masters project but does not have to. There is no word count for the poster but note that you should aim to minimise the word count. This is not a report. Your proposal should mostly draw upon the papers that you found in Element 1 (but you can include additional references). It should contain the following: Poster Heading Description Research Purpose Introduce and explain the research’s purpose: • Short introduction to your topic • Your overall research question that will be addressed by the research • Any research objectives • You must also define the anticipated product(s) i.e. the anticipated contribution to knowledge Background Context Justify the need for your research question. • Why is your research important? • What were your main findings from your final list of papers from element 1. Summarise them for the poster. • Cite the papers that you discuss. Research Methodology Identify and justify: • One or more research strategies that you will use • The data generation methods that you will use • If appropriate, your data analysis techniques Evaluation Methodology Justify how you plan to evaluate your end product(s)/contribution to knowledge. How will you check the usefulness of your findings/artefact/product to your target audience? Note that masters projects are expected to include third party evaluation of the end product if at all possible. Identify and justify: • One or more research strategies that you will use • The data generation methods that you will use • If appropriate, your data analysis techniques Schedule and Publishing • Identify the set of tasks, the timescale for each task and hence the timescale for the overall research which captures your schedule visually. • Allow 13 weeks (or 26 weeks if your studying part- time) from ‘project start’ to ‘hand-in of all project work’. Projects normally include a viva that should not be included in the schedule as it is normally after the hand-in. • Identify the academic journal or conference for which you will prepare your project’s final research paper. • You can use a project planning tool e.g. produce a GANTT chart to show your tasks. Professional, legal and ethical issues • Professional, legal and ethical issues that your proposal raises, and how they will be addressed. Upload your poster (.pdf) to Turnitin via the Element 2 submission area for this module on Blackboard. Assessment Marking Criteria Element 2 Element 2 Project Proposal Poster (60%) Research Purpose • Are the purpose of the project, • the overall research question • and the anticipated product(s) • all clearly defined and appropriate to masters level? Background Context • Have the main findings from the papers found in element 1 been summarised? • Is there a clear justification for the need for the project? • Is there good use of references, cited correctly? Research Methodology • Is an appropriate research methodology clearly described and justified? • Are strategy, data collection methods and data analysis techniques identified? Evaluation Methodology • Is there an appropriate plan (evaluation methodology) to evaluate your end product(s)/contribution to knowledge? • Is the evaluation methodology clearly described and justified, with 3rd party evaluation if possible? • Are strategy, data collection methods and data analysis techniques identified? Schedule and dissemination plans • Are all the main tasks identified? • Is there an appropriate schedule for them? • Has an appropriate journal or conference been identified? Professional. legal and ethical issues • Are all relevant professional, legal and ethical aspects clearly identified and well addressed? Poster overall quality • Is there a good standard of report writing? E.g. are all elements written in good English, spell-checked & proof-read? • Is the poster visually appealing and does it flow well? • Is there a suitable amount of text i.e. has content been summarised suitably for a poster? • Have diagrams been used appropriately? Deliverables • Element 1 Report (.docx or .pdf) uploaded to TurnItIn via Blackboard submission area. • Element 2 Poster (.pdf) uploaded to TurnItIn via Blackboard submission area Grades A (70%+) Excellent piece of work of a professional standard across all parts. Demonstrates learning and other input beyond the taught programme. B (60- 69%) Good piece of work. Satisfies all requirements to a high standard. A carefully designed literature review and project proposal. C (50- 59%) Satisfactory. Meets majority of assignment’s objectives. Demonstrates broad understanding and basic ability to use key ideas introduced through the taught programme. A few gaps or omissions but satisfactory literature review and project proposal. D (40- 49%) Relatively weak. Some assignment objectives met but generally unconvincing literature review and project proposal. E (30- 39%) Poor. Few objectives met. Little evidence of understanding or use of taught material. No attempt to extend learning, poor literature review and project proposal. F (
There are no answers to this question.
Login to buy an answer or post yours. You can also vote on other others

Get Help With a similar task to - Nursing- Research Methods. Teaching professionalism and ethics in information technology by deliberative dialogue

Related Questions

Similar orders to Nursing- Research Methods. Teaching professionalism and ethics in information technology by deliberative dialogue
189
Views
2
Answers
Popular Services
Tutlance Experts offer help in a wide range of topics. Here are some of our top services: